Title: Shadows over Longbourn
Author: Jann Rowland
Publication Date: April 8, 2016
My Grade: B-
Once again, I found another intriguing Pride & Prejudice Veriation. In the case of this novel, Elizabeth’s father Mr. Bennet dies before any of his daughters are married, but before he does he manage to convince distant relative Darcy to take in his daughters so they aren’t left to his cousin Thaddeus (father of our familar Mr. Collins).
This novel is not a bad one, although I find the opening sequence of events hard to connect to the original material. Match of the characters remain the same, although Mary ends up more outspoken, and Lydia more aware (although not by much). Instead of Wickham, who appears only briefly, the main villian is the elder Mr. Collins. Its an alright story if taken by itself, although I don’t think it works as a strong variation of Pride & Prejudice. However, it is one of the better ones I have read, and at least stands in the vicinity of what the original materal gives.
Its major issue is not the content, but the formating. I feel as if the novel could have used a run or two through the editor’s pen before it was published. Often the story would change POV without a clear distinction like some empty space or a character line. There were a few other mistakes that could have been caught by an editor. This didn’t make the story unbearable, but was something that was noticable.
Title: Pride & Prejudice & Zombies (2016)
My Rating: ….Ambigious.
You see,this movie is both bad, and good. Its got some great chemistry between actors, and some of the alterations of characters due to the circumstances are really interesting. It also has the occasionally good line. I adore Matt Smith’s Collins, and Lena Hedly’s Lady Catherine makes you less likely to dispise the woman. Charles Dance plays Mr. Bennet. I knew Lily James as Ella, from the Live-Action Cinderella but didn’t realise she was Elizabeth untill I read the credits. It also has some faces I’m unfamilar with like Sam Rielly and the rest of the cast I haven’t already mentioned. I will say while his Darcy isn’t what I usually picture Darcy being, it fits within the scope of this film and he and Lily James work well off of one another. It also gives some of the characters usually passed over in the original novel (Namely Mary Bennet) a chance to be shown a little more.
On the other hand some of the dialogue is very very cheesey and at times awkward (Example: When Darcy, watching Elizabeth kick Zombie ass, realises that she’s not that bad looking after all, and starts explaining this to Bingley whose basically “Dude, Zombies.”). It also brings the hard question – If women are being trained for battle, why is it so off set with the sexism of the day? Shouldn’t it have changed some of it? Some of the interjection of the original material by Austen is a bit awkward.
So its hard to grade this movie. I will say I enjoyed it, and I’ll probably purchase it eventually. It really doesn’t make me want to read the novel (The one the film was based on, not the original P&P, which I have read).However, its the type of Zombie movie I enjoy. The kind where there is a mix of genre (Action & Adventure, but also comedy and a touch of romance) and there are some surprising twists.
I had Lost in Austen on my Netflix Instant Queue for several weeks, and last night my mother decided it was time we watched it. It was a 3 hour long movie about a girl named Amanda Price who has a doorway to the Bennet’s house in her bathroom. She’s got a mother urging her to marry, a boyfriend who wants to marry her but proposes when he’s drunk so she doesn’t believe him, and a flatmate who appears for about 5 minutes total in the movie so she is unimportant.
spoilers beneath. Apparently I have trouble explaining a movie without explaining the whole movie. But there is a lot I left out.
Continue reading “Lost In Austen (Movie Review)” →